Homepage |
(Static sitemap) |
? Help |
Links |
Contact us
<--- Headings
(Click for help) HEADINGS ![]()
<To left: double-click | To right>: refresh | [To top^: drag]
Note: We (CharityBags) have omitted the names, ages and addresses of the collectors in the press release above. Bold added by CharityBags.
Legislation used: Although it's not stated in the press release, the prosecution was brought under the House to House Collections Act 1939.
Regulatory organisations mentioned :
No mention is made of :
The sequence above is a model of how local authorities should deal with potentially bogus charitable collections.
Van: Unlike many bogus collection vans, this one had the name of the collection organisation displayed on the outside.
Seizure: The press release doesn't say whether the bags of clothes were seized.
Note: Apparently, if the police consider the collection is 'criminal deception', the van can be seized as well as the clothes.
Eight months elapsed between the date of the collection and the court hearing.
Costs: Note that the two defendants were ordered to pay a total of £300 costs to the Council. Thus the Council recouped some/all of the expense incurred in bringing the prosecution.
Related pages :